Back to directory

Agent Skills for Synalinks

A single Agent Skill, in the shared SKILL.md format read by Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and other agents, that teaches a coding agent to write idiomatic code against the Keras-inspired Synalinks framework instead of mixing in Keras, LangChain or DSPy syntax.

Agent Skills for Synalinks

This repository ships one skill, synalinks, covering the whole Synalinks framework for coding agents that read the open Agent Skills SKILL.md format. Synalinks is Keras-inspired, and without this guidance a language model tends to mix Keras, LangChain and DSPy syntax, producing plausible-looking but broken code; the skill constrains an agent to idiomatic Synalinks usage instead.

The SKILL.md file is organized into one section per slice of the framework, each pointing to a runnable script with its captured run log and a deep-dive reference document: core data structures and operators, the Program class and its building APIs, reusable modules such as Generator and ChainOfThought, control-flow modules such as Decision and Branch, decision models, agent types such as FunctionCallingAgent and DeepAgent with MCP integration, a DuckDB-backed knowledge base with retrieval-augmented and knowledge-augmented generation, and a Keras-style compile, fit, evaluate and predict training loop.

An agent auto-activates the skill based on its SKILL.md description.

More in Agent skills

See all 581
  • Provenance gate

    github.com

    A deterministic authorization gateway that sits between an AI agent and its tools, tracing where each parameter of a side-effect call came from, and blocking the call or asking a human when the source does not check out.

  • A markdown framework of system rules that restates Isaac Asimov's Four Laws of Robotics as a set of prioritized loss calculations for large-language-model agents to follow, published as a discovery file for agents and crawlers to read.

  • Vitruvius

    github.com

    An engineering research agent that runs a discover, read, synthesize, verify and review loop over technical questions, reading sources directly rather than inferring from titles, and publishing its own scored verifier benchmark, weaknesses included.