Back to directory

CoWorker Protocol

A peer-to-peer protocol that lets someone serve a private AI skill as a callable remote function over an encrypted channel, so a caller receives only the result and never the underlying prompt, code, or methodology.

CoWorker Protocol

CoWorker Protocol turns a Markdown skill file into a callable remote API that runs on the skill owner's own machine: a caller invokes the skill and receives the computed result, but the prompt, code, and methodology behind it are never transmitted anywhere, addressing the problem that a plain text skill file can otherwise simply be copied by anyone who can open it. It uses end-to-end encryption over the XMTP messaging protocol and a four-level trust model of untrusted, known, internal, and privileged callers that the skill owner controls.

Access can automatically downgrade once a defined objective is complete rather than staying open indefinitely, and a hidden skill reports as unknown to a caller who is not authorized to see it exists at all. Because the caller's request reaches a function interface rather than the owner's language model directly, the protocol also narrows prompt-injection risk down to whatever that function's return value exposes, and reusable, non-expiring invite codes let an owner share access to a running skill through any channel.

More in Agent skills

See all 581
  • Provenance gate

    github.com

    A deterministic authorization gateway that sits between an AI agent and its tools, tracing where each parameter of a side-effect call came from, and blocking the call or asking a human when the source does not check out.

  • A markdown framework of system rules that restates Isaac Asimov's Four Laws of Robotics as a set of prioritized loss calculations for large-language-model agents to follow, published as a discovery file for agents and crawlers to read.

  • Vitruvius

    github.com

    An engineering research agent that runs a discover, read, synthesize, verify and review loop over technical questions, reading sources directly rather than inferring from titles, and publishing its own scored verifier benchmark, weaknesses included.