Back to directory

openclaw-superpowers

A library of 56 skills for the OpenClaw self-modifying AI agent runtime, adding structured planning, security guardrails, cron-scheduled maintenance, crash recovery and the ability to write its own new skills.

openclaw-superpowers

openclaw-superpowers is a skill library for OpenClaw, an open-source AI agent runtime that runs persistently rather than only responding inside a chat window. Installing its 56 skills in one command gives an OpenClaw agent brainstorming, planning and systematic-debugging skills before it acts; six security skills that detect prompt injection, block dangerous actions, audit installed code and scan for leaked credentials; twelve cron-scheduled skills for memory cleanup, health checks, budget tracking and community monitoring; and self-recovery, loop-breaking and task-handoff skills for crashes and restarts.

Its most distinctive skill lets the agent write a new skill file during an ordinary conversation, so a stated preference such as always checking for security issues in a review becomes a permanent, live behavior with no restart needed. A separate skill scans Reddit periodically for community pain points and feature requests and scores them by signal strength.

It is inspired by the unrelated obra/superpowers project, extended for agents meant to run continuously.

More in Agent skills

See all 581
  • Provenance gate

    github.com

    A deterministic authorization gateway that sits between an AI agent and its tools, tracing where each parameter of a side-effect call came from, and blocking the call or asking a human when the source does not check out.

  • A markdown framework of system rules that restates Isaac Asimov's Four Laws of Robotics as a set of prioritized loss calculations for large-language-model agents to follow, published as a discovery file for agents and crawlers to read.

  • Vitruvius

    github.com

    An engineering research agent that runs a discover, read, synthesize, verify and review loop over technical questions, reading sources directly rather than inferring from titles, and publishing its own scored verifier benchmark, weaknesses included.