Back to directory

Local coding agent evals

A set of small practical scripts and task packs for comparing local language models and coding-agent harnesses, measuring raw inference speed, tool-choice reasoning and whether an agent can finish real coding tasks.

Local coding agent evals

Local coding agent evals is a small collection of scripts and task packs the author used while comparing local models and coding-agent harnesses such as Qwen Code, Codex and Claude Code running against Ollama-hosted models, published to accompany a written article rather than as a comprehensive benchmark.

It has three parts, each testing a different layer: a speed and memory benchmark measuring Ollama's prefill speed, decode speed, wall time and memory use across longer prompts, testing the model and inference engine together; a hard tool-reasoning benchmark that asks a model to return one tool decision for five harder reasoning tasks without executing them, testing the model's base capability; and an agent problem pack of five small coding tasks run against a real coding-agent harness in an isolated workspace, testing the model and harness combination together. Because a coding agent can read files outside its intended scope, the author recommends running the agent benchmarks in an isolated workspace, a separate user account, a virtual machine, or a separate machine.

More in AI evals

See all 269
  • Provenance gate

    github.com

    A deterministic authorization gateway that sits between an AI agent and its tools, tracing where each parameter of a side-effect call came from, and blocking the call or asking a human when the source does not check out.

  • JevBench

    benchmarkheaven.com

    A reproducible benchmark from Benchmark Heaven that ranks Jev-class typed decision models on intelligence, calibration, speed, and cost, with a published harness, scoring rules, and results.

  • A co-evolutionary adversarial red-teaming tool for AI agents that uses quality-diversity evolutionary search to autonomously breed edge-case scenarios, testing whether an agent with tool access can be made to hallucinate, deadlock or leak funds.